Guardian’s View on Biometric Technology in Schools: Watch Carefully | Editorial

NSNews that he has a school in North Ayrshire, Scotland Introduced face recognition technology There are many questions to support payments in the cafeteria. The company behind the plan, CRB Cunninghams, says it can save valuable time by speeding up the process of children lining up and paying. The North Ayrshire Council states that 97% of children or their parents have agreed. The rest will provide another way to buy food.

But this deal between a local government and a tech company that aims to get rid of cash from schools in the UK is not easy for its supporters to present. Face recognition technology is still relatively new. Its various formats and applications are unfamiliar to most people, and their use is controversial. The Scottish meal payment system is said to be different from “live” facial recognition software, where a computer scans the crowd to match faces. The encrypted template of the child’s face is stored on the school’s server.However, the person in charge of the privacy campaign etc. Naturally concerned About the decision to make face scanning a part of a child’s daily life.

NS Use of bio-fingerprint It has been widespread for years in the English school cafeteria. Time pressures aside, it’s easy to see why head teachers and other managers were so keen on moving away from cash, which became awkward and labor-intensive in the electronic era. However, just because students and their families are accustomed to using some biometric data does not mean that these systems need to be extended. Also, the idea that facial recognition is a Covid and safer technology than fingerprints, as suggested for North Ayrshire, does not fully justify the decisions made. On the contrary, the deal with CRB Cunninghams should be seen as an important step towards normalizing the use of facial recognition technology by public institutions.

What people think of this and similar developments depends on the importance of focusing on privacy and personal data and how tech companies trust them to process them. There is no doubt that companies are keen on testing new features and figuring out how to make money from them. The use of such technology has proven illegal in some countries.Last year, the Court of Appeals ruled the use of facial recognition technology by Welsh police. Violation of privacy and equality law.. In the United States and Sweden, schools have been suspended from using it to monitor attendance and security.

Buyers and sellers of these systems usually present them as useful tools and nothing more. But as Professor Kate Crawford, Recent book author At this point, companies are ahead of democratic debate and decision-making, as AI and other critics have pointed out. The challenge of how to regulate and secure consent to the types of information gathering that digital technology enables has a long way to go. And while this is true, to put it mildly, using a child as a guinea pig is ethically questionable.

Guardian’s View on Biometric Technology in Schools: Watch Carefully | Editorial

Source link Guardian’s View on Biometric Technology in Schools: Watch Carefully | Editorial

Back to top button