Inequality: Bias for SEN students who are at a “general” disadvantage in evaluation | Equal

Teacher evaluation According to a study by the UK testing regulator Ofqual, there is often a prejudice against underprivileged students and students in need of special education (SEN). Concerns about performance this summer..

The findings were based on Review Of existing studies on bias in teacher evaluation guidance for Teachers assessing GCSE and A-level students this year If there is no exam.

Evidence of “slight prejudice” in favor of girls and various evidences of ethnicity were common, but prejudice against underprivileged and SEN students was a “general finding.”

Regulators said measures were taken to mitigate the risk of this year’s performance bias, but Labor said the study raised serious concerns about the government’s summer assessment process. ..

GCSE and A level Students will be awarded grades by the teacher again this summer after the exam has been canceled for the second consecutive year due to the confusion caused by Covid’s pandemic.

Kate Green, a shadow education secretary, said, “Teachers urgently need government support to ensure that all students, across subjects, schools and communities, receive fair and consistent grades. But the minister has waived responsibility. “

She states: “Last summer’s chaotic mishandling of test results created a great deal of stress for students to prevent inconsistent grades and prevent such confusion from happening again. There is an urgent need to know what action to take. “

Ofqual said analysis No evidence was found in the UK’s last year’s Center Evaluation results that students were systematically disadvantaged based on certain protected traits or socioeconomic status.

“This is good news,” said author Paul Newton. Ofqual blog.. “And Review We have reached some conclusions announced today, but this year’s teacher evaluation is not necessarily biased.

“But we emphasize the importance of taking safety measures, including quality assurance arrangements.”

Ofqual invites teachers to discuss each decision with colleagues, such as special education needs coordinators and SEN experts. Each grade must be approved by at least two teachers to limit the risk of bias.

Regulators say that each decision should be made purely based on evidence of student behavior and that other factors such as attitudes and behavior should be unilateral, and teachers can undermine judgment. You will be asked to recognize and think about different types of unconscious cognitive biases about strategies to minimize them.

“The size of the literature we draw is fairly limited and may be distorted to some extent by publication bias, so evidence of effectiveness is more public than evidence of ineffectiveness. It’s more likely, “said Ofqual blog.

“Therefore, teachers’ assessments are not necessarily biased in these ways this year, but this is because the literature shows that teachers’ assessments carry a risk of prejudice. It is very important to implement arrangements to mitigate risk this year. “

Inequality: Bias for SEN students who are at a “general” disadvantage in evaluation | Equal

Source link Inequality: Bias for SEN students who are at a “general” disadvantage in evaluation | Equal

Back to top button