New shipper apcyberax writing : A judge ruled that security cameras and a Ring doorbell were installed in a house in Oxfordshire “Unjustifiably invaded” the privacy of a neighbor, in a case that could have implications for home monitoring devices. Dr Mary Fairhurst claimed the devices in neighbor Jon Woodard’s home violated data laws and contributed to harassment. The judge upheld both of these allegations. Mr. Woodard now faces a substantial fine. He claimed to have installed the devices in good faith as a deterrent against burglars.
The origin of the row stems from an invitation by Mr Woodard to his neighbor, Dr Fairhurst, to visit his home under renovation, during which she claimed he had shown his new security system. The judgment says Dr Fairhurst was “alarmed and dismayed” to notice that he had a camera mounted in his hangar and that images of it were sent to his smartphone. A series of disputes over the cameras ensued, leading Dr Fairhurst to leave his home. In the judgment, the Ring doorbell was found to have captured footage of the plaintiff’s house and garden, while the shed camera covered almost all of his garden and parking space.
Neighbor wins privacy dispute over doorbell and smart cameras
Source link Neighbor wins privacy dispute over doorbell and smart cameras