Tattoos are facing a payer grayer in Europe

Plus empty flesh and thighs, the sun rises in the oceans and bathes coral and fish in the fresh water. At low feet, frogs are clearly trembling, as if it were supporting the emergence of dew. I’m sorry eyes with bright blue looking out from the bicep inside.

At his home in the northern Italian city of Grado, Alex De Pase discusses some of the thousands of plans he has made for his career as a tattoo artist. But these leathers may not be able to adapt in 2023 – even if they are not the same color.

A new law on ink tattoos and permanent makeup began across the European Union this January to reduce the risk of putting things that could be a health hazard. The system has also led to a huge increase in the company’s capacity in storage, where ink manufacturers recycle all product lines to comply.

There could be more turmoil in the minds of painters next year, when the ban begins with a blue-colored live pigment that ink manufacturers say is impossible. to replace it. This provoked controversy among tattooists who argued that the restriction was excessive, creating unnecessary anxiety among clients and undermining their expertise.

European law may indicate changes in the United States, where Dietary and pharmaceutical care includes some care of ink and pigment. Last November, when Dr. Linda Katz, head of the Department of Cosmetics and Color, gave a presentation at a conference on tattoo protection in Berlin and asked if the country would fit its standards with European ones, he zara: “That will still be seen, and we are working in the area itself.”

Mr. De Pase, who is known for his fake tattoos – mainly his paintings – that he puts in his home theater, said he carefully blends the shades to get it. subtle ways of skin tone. She says: “I am well-known for my tattoos. “For me, this is a problem.”

Immediately after the rebellion of sailors and riders, tattoos of a long time ago take away any chance of being a form of art around the mouth. Studies show that about a quarter of Europeans aged 18 to 35 and almost one third American adult tattoos. Given all ink-containing skin, the listed problems are rare and often involve bacterial or allergic reactions. But the rule has not yet gained popularity: only a few European countries are responsible for the national ink tattoo. To date, there have been no maintenance regulations across the European Union.

Modern ink tattoos are a bit confusing. They include non-abrasive pigments that provide shade or color, a binding agent to keep the pigment suspended in the liquid as it is transferred to the skin and water and other substances. melting as glycerin and alcohol affect ink quality, as well as preservatives and other additives.

Upon injection, some pigment remains permanently on the skin, but it can also move to the lymph nodes. When exposed to sunlight or during laser removal, pigment can also enter a new compound that can be toxic and spread throughout the body.

Over the years, traditional ink manufacturers have incorporated heavy metals such as barium and copper into their pigments to create an expanding color palette, and neurotoxic agents such as cadmium, lead and arsenic to is written in high quality ink. These can also be found in vegan ink, which removes exclusively glycerin from animals and other organisms.

Since 2015, Europe has required manufacturers of ink labels to disclose their potential risks. But because rare pigments are produced in many industries for use in all kinds of products, including clothing and automobiles, they are not always as clean as one might expect. in a skin implant.

Ines Schreiver, head of the Federal Institute for Risk Assessment in Germany focuses on toxicology of tattoos, stated that the basic questions about the revelation and ink were not answered. Among the unknown are how many inks enter the body, the relationship between the exposure and the adverse reactions that sometimes occur and any disease can appear years later.

She said: “I would not describe tattoos as ‘good’ or ‘bad’. “I tell my friends to tell themselves about the potential effects and the uncertainties.”

After a lengthy discussion of the European Chemicals Agency, those The European Commission chose to focus on the material be aware of hazardous, long list of chemicals banned for use in cosmetics as well as limiting the total collection of certain fragile or irritating compounds.

The ban includes two pigments, Blue 15: 3 and Green 7, based in part on decades of research linking their use of hair color with a high risk of colon cancer. Recognizing the approval of the ink manufacturers to replace the pigments but there is no evidence to support their safety, the committee has lifted its ban until next year.

“The substances are absorbed into the human body for long-term and long-term contact – for life.” said Ana María Blass Rico, commissioner of legal affairs. “So it’s safe.”

Dr. Jørgen Serup, a Danish dermatologist who has been working at Copenhagen’s Bispebjerg Hospital since 2008, says the law has passed. But in his opinion, these are unintentionally targeted, outlining a number of factors that should not be used when dealing with well-known problems such as the germs of inks over time. output. Of the thousands of patients he treated for dementia, he found that red blood cells were often associated with an allergic reaction. He said, “There is, by the hospital, no reason to ban blue and green.”

Regulators are in a difficult position, according to Lesliam Quirós-Alcalá, an assistant professor at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and an expert on chemical exposure and their potential health effects. There are more than 40,000 chemicals known to be used in business, and the risks involved are unknown. Also, the risks may vary for a person depending on many factors including their level of exposure to the substance, genetics and existing disease. He says: “No scientist can tell you now that this is the chemical that you are most worried about.

But banning drugs and leaving the company to find a replacement is not the answer, either. Ms. Quirós-Alcalá said, “It is not uncommon for us to replace chemicals that we know may increase the likelihood of adverse health effects and other regrets.”

The United States has taken a more lenient approach than Europe has. The FDA has patent protection for pigment as a preservative, but no tattoo manufacturer has applied for the name, and no U.S. ink manufacturer is required to disclose its composition.

With little care for a wide range of cosmetic products, the company limited itself to pursuing undamaged or reputable products and providing a level of safety. Proponents of her case have been working to make the actual transcript of this statement available online. In response to a question, the company issued a statement stating that it was aware of European standards but did not assess the risks of banned pigments.

The killers, who suddenly became concerned that their skills and abilities might be in danger, violated the rules. In October 2020, some issued a request to “Save pigment, ”Spread by a global community of tattooists and their large-scale media coverage. So far, the petition has garnered more than 178,000 signatures.

One of the distributors of the request was Mario Barth, CEO of Intenze Tattoo Ink, a Las Vegas-based ink manufacturer. He said the company could move away from the law by creating its own standards, but suffered from lack of support from ink manufacturers who still see themselves as consumers. “So those who did not know anything about it said, ‘Well, let’s ban it all.’

In the United States, the largest producer of tattoos in Europe, manufacturers are quick to adapt their products to meet new standards. One of the pioneers, World Famous Tattoo Ink, has a new facility in Greenville, SC, where every month in a clean, undamaged room, 400,000 bottles are filled into the package.

The owner, Lou Rubino, opened his first tattoo shop in St. Petersburg. Marks Place in New York in 1998, shortly after Council City. ebuliri a long-standing ban on tattooing so that underground artists can perform in public again. At the time, the company made its inks in a warehouse on Long Island. He recalls: “I used to have people sitting around filling jars with discarded tea bags sold on the floor.

World Famous has updated its products in the past, for example to remove formaldehyde which is banned in Switzerland. But Mr Rubino said the new law required drastic changes, forcing the company to pay another laboratory to determine if the products met the chemical requirements. Because World Famous did not test its products with animals, staff and their families and friends released their skins to measure the performance of the new inks.

While World Famous has been investigating the possible replacement of banned pigments, Mr. Rubino said they have not found anything suitable. “If that doesn’t happen, there will be a little blue and green on the tattoo,” he said.

Creating a new ink to comply with the law cost the company millions of dollars, he planned – he could not say whether the results were safe. “We are not sure whether these are better or worse because we are adding other unused items to the tattoo.”

Nordic Tattoo Supplies, which distributes inks across Europe, said World Famous paint products were the first to comply with the new rules sold in early January – at more than double the price of their original inks . Nonetheless, the demand exceeds the offer, and they will allocate the number sold per customer. Nordic spokeswoman Jenni Lehtovaara said the situation was improving as more manufacturers brought new ink to market, but the options were still limited. “We don’t have the same palettes as before, it’s not even close.”

Mr De Pase, who also owns a chain of nine tattoo parlors, said the workers threw away their old inks by the end of 2021 and spent the first three weeks of this year working only in black and gray. His company now spends about 5,000 euros a month, about $ 5,200, to store new ink. Mr. De Pase was satisfied with their performance, but said it would take years to see how they endured in the skin of his clients.

“Safety will take precedence,” he said, but that should set it against some acceptance for threats. He discovered that a tobacco shop was waiting for one of his theaters to sell cigarettes and cigars all day long. “There is a good mark.”

Tattoos are facing a payer grayer in Europe

Source link Tattoos are facing a payer grayer in Europe

Back to top button