The discovery of a new vaccine raises serious questions for parents of children

For American parents, especially those with children, the last few months have been more stressful and more frustrating.

In early February, federal officials announced they would test the Pfizer-BioNTech coronavirus vaccine for minors – only to eliminate the plan ten days later, expressing doubts about the effectiveness of the vaccine body and the generation.

Soon, scientists reported that the vaccine was the only one weak security against diseases from the Omicron type among children 5 to 11 years of age and its mean provides less protection against moderate Covid syndrome among adolescents 12 to 17 years.

On Monday, citing these data, a Florida general surgeon declared the children healthy should not be vaccinatedThe advice of Jen Psaki, White House press secretary, is “deeply disturbing.”

In the meantime, experts continue to support the vaccine, stating that although Omicron may be safe and effective in humans, the vaccine is still effective. prevent serious illness and death – and can do it for many years.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found that statistics of children Below 5 to be hospitalized during Omicron surgery, highlighting the need for vaccines for the children. But the company has since asserted that 90 percent of Americans can stop wearing insurance coverage safely in public housing, even in schools with children.

Who can blame parents for their confusion?

Anne Gonzalez, a 41-year-old mother of two who cares for volunteers for a large religious group in St. Petersburg. “I have come to the point where I can only do what I think is right for my family.”

Fortunately, the coming weeks should bring some clarity. Both Pfizer and Moderna plan to report findings from their experimental vaccine to children. The results, if any, should lead to a new review of the policy, perhaps during April, which could provide immunization opportunities for tens of millions of children.

But the findings come as the Omicron brand is declining in the United States, disrupting parental decisions about whether children should be vaccinated.

Less than one in four children aged 5 to 11 now receive adequate immunizations. More than half of all 12- to 17-year-olds have been fully vaccinated, but only about 12 percent have been vaccinated. Those percentages are even down in the countryside of the United States.

Children are less likely to get sick, so the balance of risk and benefit is less than that of adults. But so far, about 95 percent of the country has some protection from the virus as a result of vaccination or pre-infection, according to the report. new data from the CDC.

Experts are concerned that new discoveries have made it increasingly difficult for some parents to administer medication to their children.

“We should be disappointed with the data – we want it to be better,” said Luciana Borio, a former head of science and nutrition and drug control. “But soon, it is important for parents to vaccinate children.”

The city could still see an increase in autumn or winter, and the best protection for children would have been at least two times earlier, he said.

This ongoing vaccine prevents disease and severe death, even in Omicron models. The practice is particularly evident in hospitals, Drs. James Campbell, a physician at the University of Maryland School of Medicine and a member of the American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Infectious Diseases said.

Among her pediatric patients who needed oxygen or died, “none of them had any vaccine,” Drs. Campbell said.

Recent studies show that the problem is not as serious as the dose.

In the adult test in 2020, vaccine manufacturers think of the best and most appropriate method and then choose the shortest time between shots to protect people as quickly as possible during the first surgery. .

The drug Pfizer-BioNTech in Moderna has proven to be effective as well as robust in clinical trials and also gives it quick release for use. But the test for children is complicated by the arrival of Delta and Omicron models, and the vaccine seems unsafe in children 2 to 4 years old.

At present, Pfizer-BioNTech is the only vaccine approved for children. (Moderna and Johnson & Johnson’s contraceptives are approved only for adults.)

In the Pfizer test, 12 to 17 micrograms were given to 12-year-olds, the same dose given to adults. But children between the ages of 5 and 11 received 10 micrograms, and those between 6 and 5 months received only three micrograms.

These dosages may be limited to maximizing complete and long-term response. But government officials who saw the data told The New York Times that overdose causes high fever in children.

What would you do if you could not give a high-dose drug to protect children against the Omicron type due to side effects? That is the problem that scientists and federal officials are currently facing.

Pfizer and BioNTech are currently testing the third drug in children under the age of 12 to determine whether it can release a safe level of two ineffective drugs. The FDA is still testing Moderna vaccine for use in children 6 to 11. Last week, the company refused the application for the ability of Indian antibiotics made Covaxin for children.

There are other Covid antibiotics, such as those made by Novavax and Sanofi, that may turn out to work well in children. Public health officials should consider all of these options and test whether a different medication or longer between doses will improve the immune response, experts said.

“I feel that childhood vaccines are taking longer than they should, due to the need to protect that number,” Drs. Borio said. “The sooner we increase our search for safe and effective vaccines for children, the better off we will be.”

Depressive research, as well as Omicron surgery backlash, has challenged prognosis for local health professionals.

Following the advice of Florida, Louisiana and California to require students to be vaccinated by the fall of 2022, the District of Columbia has set a March 1 deadline for 12 students and more to be fully vaccinated.

Other states may accept similar proposals but they can only do so if the FDA fully provides the vaccine for use with students, said Hemi Tewarson, director of the National Academy for State Health Policy. , a non-partisan congregation.

“For many of them, that would be the main reason for seeking immunizations as a rule,” he said.

School immunizations will reduce the fears of many families with children with health problems.

Almost everyone in Heather Keever’s family, including her son, Wesley, 14, has heart disease, high blood pressure and kidney disease. But because they do not accept the vaccine, they have not yet reached home for the workplace or at school, Ms. Keever, 42, a Chicago suburb counselor said.

He said, “They forget that there are some of us who cannot afford to remove the cover,” at least until the rate falls sharply, he said. “I feel like I have nothing and I don’t need it. There is an argument that I can throw it away. I still do.”

Some scientists have said that they will continue to wear masks until the numbers fall because of the risk of infection.

Because children of small doses of vaccine have not been vaccinated, “I would be reluctant to ask a child under the age of 5 to remove the cover indoors,” said Akiko Iwasaki, an immunologist at Yale University. which studies long-term Covid, a cluster of symptoms may persist long after the major disease has been resolved.

Given the mud effects and effectiveness of vaccines as well as information combined with the benefits of masks, families are considering the risk themselves – coming to a very different conclusion.

Jennifer Steinberg, a managing director in Wilmington, Del., Has two daughters who parted ways with their estranged father.

“Yeah, well, it protects against serious illness,” Mrs. Steinberg said of the vaccine. “But if your children are still infected, this is a big problem in family life. I will probably have to cover for the foreseeable future.”

Katie Sunderland of Arlington, Va., Is ready to leave the cover. If his children, 7 and 5, get sick, “that’s my business if they can uncover the cover and see the face,” he said.

Ms. Sunderland, 37, said, “I do not believe that wearing a cover would reduce the risk of getting Covid in any way – not the type of cover I see a lot of kids wearing.” “It is useless for me to prevent the development of my children because the high risk is very low.”

But many other parents still do not know what to do. Ms Gonzalez has a nephew and nephew with disabilities and problems with lung capacity, and will continue to wear protective clothing to protect them, she said.

But if her son’s school dropped the required coverage, “we don’t know what to do.”

The discovery of a new vaccine raises serious questions for parents of children

Source link The discovery of a new vaccine raises serious questions for parents of children

Back to top button