- The U.S. Supreme Court appears ready to overturn Roe v. Wade and reduce access to abortion nationwide.
- The erosion of reproductive rights has only happened in a handful of countries in the 21st century.
- Experts warn that a withdrawal of access to abortion is a sign of backward democracy and insidious authoritarianism.
- Visit Business Insider for more stories.
Like the U.S. Supreme Court appears clarified to overturn precedent in Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey, experts warn that the rollback of access to abortion is evidence of recurring democracies.
“There is a tendency to keep an eye on countries that have not necessarily successfully rolled it back, but are introducing legislation to roll it back,” said Rebecca Turkington, a researcher at the University of Cambridge. New York Times last year regarding access to abortion. “[I]n that this is part of a broader repression of women’s rights. And it goes hand in hand with insidious authoritarianism. “
“We believe Roe and Casey should be set aside,” Judge Alito wrote in the document, stamped as “the court’s opinion.” It reported Police. “It is time to take account of the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the elected representatives of the people.”
Few countries have eroded existing access laws on abortion in the 21st century. Among them: Poland, Nicaragua, and the United States. The changes in the established legislation came at times political unrest, as the United States at present.
IN Nicaragua, President Daniel Ortega adopted a total abortion ban in 2006 as part of an increasingly authoritarian platform. Poland 2020 almost total abortion ban came a moment after one of the country’s top judges said the country was “moves fast“against an authoritarian regime.
Polish law is now one of the most restrictive bans on abortion in Europe, and nine organizations have submitted interventions to organizations such as Amnesty International on behalf of women in the country.
“We do not necessarily always include reproductive freedom in that package of democracy,” said Anu Kumar, head of Ipasa global non-profit organization for reproductive rights, told Foreign Policy. “But we should, because this is a place where authoritarian regimes often go, if not first, then quite quickly afterwards.”
Get the best out of our site email to you every weekday.
Go to Business Insiders front page for more stories.
Undermining abortion rights is rare, ‘goes hand in hand with insidious authoritarianism’ – experts
Source link Undermining abortion rights is rare, ‘goes hand in hand with insidious authoritarianism’ – experts