Business

Who is in a bad situation and how? – Ivo Vegter at Amazon HQ

I have to admit a certain bias in the context of this unbelievable reaction to the Supreme Court ruling that imposed a temporary ban on billions of dollars Structure of the River Club at the Observatory, Cape Town. When I read the judge’s reasons for granting the order (and after considering the Supreme Court both here and in London for a few years), I could not help but think that the position given by the Vice President to the protesters was a bit rich. Ivo Vegter writes here Everyday friend, burying both the actual and quoted actual opponents, with great success. A cost-effective exercise on a fair scale reveals no issue. Thousands more and the environment (perhaps not quite aesthetically), will benefit and less than a handful will suffer. Vegter argues that these handfuls are historically disadvantaged, low-income people whose anger and resentment have been directed at a cause driven by radical leftists, which has progressed rapidly since the advent of the ruling socialist government. You choose. – Chris Bateman

Left-wing extremists behind the Amazon HQ case

by Ivo Vegter *

On the surface, opposition to building the River Club property at the Observatory in Cape Town appears to be a cultural, grassroots movement. In fact, the radical left is behind it.

Ivo Vegter. Photo credit: The Daily Friend

When I first discussed campaign against restructuring of the River Club property at the Observatory in Cape Town, to host mixed-use development attached to Amazon’s new headquarters in South Africa, I blamed “activist barriers” on the “environmental movement or” concerned citizens “for sabotaging economic growth and job creation.

All the arguments I made in that column – that the site is a nine-hole golf course with a driving range, a restaurant and a bar, which no indigenous people had claimed; that at least some organizations oppose the development were created long after the development was announced; that the activists showed no evidence that the country had neither current nor historical significance for them; that Cape Town has carried out extensive environmental, heritage and socio-economic assessments; and to developers had extensive consultations with the first local nations – maintain their value.

It was therefore with some astonishment that I read about the ruling of the Assistant Judge Patricia Goliath, President of the Western Cape Supreme Court (ruling that I could not find published online at the time of writing and which the courts could not grant before my deadline).

The ruling temporarily halted the River Club’s reconstruction project and ordered the developer, Liesbeek Leisure Properties Trust, to undertake “significant involvement and consultation” with unnamed members of the Khoisan people.

Front

It is therefore with considerable relief and anticipation that I read a few days later that the contractors are planning powerful setback against ridiculous claims, such as that the country is where activities are held (as any other golf course would not be) and that the golf course is an undeveloped pasture that the Khoekhoe people use for their cattle, watching satellite maps will soon lead to light that is a real fabrication.

Only those who are really naive would believe that “indigenous” groups, who are generally exposed to protests against economic development, are not puppets for a hidden agenda. Behind them is usually a group of environmental rights lawyers and elite “concerned citizens”.

But who are these concerned citizens and why would they want to prevent development in their neighborhood that attracts foreign and domestic investment to the area, will create thousands of jobs, will greatly improve the quality of the polluted environment and turn back down, low value nine hole golf course in high quality mixed structure that will inevitably improve real estate prices?

In this case, the links point to the cabin of radical leftists. In a guilt-ridden chain, one can (albeit to say the least) get all the way to an international non-governmental organization (NGO) called in a sensible way The global campaign to restore people’s sovereignty, abolish corporate power and stop impunityor Global Campaign, in short.

While some of its goals should resonate with classic liberals – such as fighting corporate human rights abuses, ending friendships and corruption between big business and governments, and protecting the environment – it has a brief overview. International Convention on the Supervision of Multinational Enterprises (a treaty that, fortunately, no one has signed) confirms that this is nothing more than an anti-capitalist campaign against the globalization of a group of deceived radical socialists.

That is The Battle of Seattle and Hernema Wall Street much, a decade or two later, but not a day wiser.

Their slogans include “abolish corporate power” and “stop the robbery, Africa is not for sale”. For people with similar radical leftist convictions, Amazon represents the power of business, the proposed hiring of Africans equates to “exploitation” and its profits would “rob”. Therefore, the development of new headquarters in South Africa must be prevented by all necessary means.

And because South African courts seem overly sensitive to supernatural claims about sacred land and sea, it means accepting people from poor communities to turn their unbridled anger against capitalist development projects.

Guilt by organizations

I can not say with certainty that the Global Campaign is involved in, or even aware of, a particular River Club case – and let’s be honest, it probably is not – but let’s still start tracing the link.

The Transnational organization (TNI), another major international non-governmental organization, is an “international research and interest organization committed to building a just, democratic and sustainable world”.

“For almost 50 years,” it says, “TNI has served as a unique link between social movements, active scholars, and policy makers.

It fights against things like free trade. Its Corporate Development Project “develops analyzes and proposals on how to end corporate impunity and abolish corporate power”.

Given this wording, it is not surprising that TNI is the “leader of the international movement Stop Corporate Impunity. [that is, Global Campaign] and supports international efforts to establish binding international legal obligations for TNCs [transnational corporations]“.

TNI recommends the work of Non-traditional information development center (AIDC), a non-governmental organization in South Africa that “was established in 1996 in response to the democratic transition in South Africa and the new opportunities and challenges it brought to those seeking greater social justice in a democracy”.

(This is the weakest link in the chain. Skeptics should ignore my references to TNI and the Global Campaign altogether, although I think they serve a useful explanatory purpose for organizations that share the same opinion and support.)

AIDC is a left-wing economic think tank funded by a number of left-wing groups, including Oxfam and the George Soros’ Open Society Foundation. It builds views of the socialist political economy á misdiagnosis of Thomas Piketty and Emmanuel Saez. It blames the incredible unemployment in South Africa for the profiteering of capitalism, despite the fact that the country has a socialist government that controls half of the economy and in successful countries capitalism does not incite unemployment at all.

It is clear that its references to “other information” and “other knowledge” are far-left echoes of the “other facts” of the far right.

It is preoccupied with issues such as “trade union opposition to austerity”, opposes Eskom’s split on the premise that it is a precursor to privatization and “the dangers and pitfalls of a free trade agreement on the African continent”.

Amandla

In 2008, AIDC merged with Amandla Media, the founder Amandla magazine as a “left-wing media project” in 2006. The aim was to create an “open space that is not a cult where progressive perspectives are analyzed, debated and people are mobilized to take an informed stand on important issues facing humanity in context. of the multidimensional crisis of civilization “.

Say it with your mouth full of delicious international corporate snacks!

The non-religious thing is particularly funny, as the “progressive” party appears only two words later. Amandla very much is a partisan publication. Among its most recent headlines are cult groups of exciting anti-capitalist ideas such as What does ECO-FEMINIST-SOCIALISM mean? (shouting their caps, not mine).

That article was written by members of Amandla magazine rather large Advisory Committee. On that table are old communists and socialists such as Jeremy Cronin, Vishwas Satgar, Willie Madisha, Noam Chomsky, Yunus Carrim and Ferial Haffajee. Also on the board, which is at odds with the crème de la crème of radical leftists, is a UCT professor (there are always scholars, aren’t there?) Named Leslie London. He is particularly interested in inequality and health policy.

He once written paper entitled Hydrogen Fracture in Pottery: Public Health Challenges for South Africa. It seems to have disappeared from the internet, but I would be surprised if Professor London knew more about fracking than what he learned from tendencies, partisan documentaries such as Josh Fox’s Gasland.

That paper, however, confirms that he is a fighter against development, so it is not surprising that Professor London is chairman of the Citizens’ Observatorywhere Tauriq Jenkins, a professional left fighter who News 24 describes as “spokesman for the Goringhaicona Khoena Indigenous Council”.

Red under the bed

These two organizations, the Observatory Civic Association and the Goringhaicona Khoena Council, were candidates in the case against Liesbeek Leisure Property Trust.

Of course, all of these connections are nothing but guilt-ridden by organizations, but they justify the view that professional activists and far-left agitators are behind the obstacle course, and that their motive is simply to prevent capitalist development in South Africa, regardless of because. benefits, advances, profits and paid jobs that they destroy in the process.

Dig deep enough and there are actually reds under the bed.

  • Ivo Vegter is a freelance journalist, columnist and speaker who loves to deny myths and delusions and covers topics from the perspective of individual freedom and free markets. Follow him on Twitter, @IvoVegter.
  • The author’s views are not necessarily those of Daily Friend or IRR. If you like what you have recently read, support the daily friend.

Also read:

(Visited 1 times, 1 visits today)

Who is in a bad situation and how? – Ivo Vegter at Amazon HQ

Source link Who is in a bad situation and how? – Ivo Vegter at Amazon HQ

Back to top button